Policy on the use of generative Artificial Intelligence

Criteria for the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

At DYCSVICTORIA, we are committed to incorporating technological advancements that contribute to the reliability, transparency, and timeliness of editorial processes. In this regard, we recognize the benefits of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in research activities and in the internal processes related to scholarly publishing.

Consequently, the Journal is committed to ensuring the responsible and ethical use of these tools, adhering to the applicable international principles and standards governing scientific publications. Likewise, it is understood that AI, as a tool, does not replace human authorship or responsibilities, whether those of authors, reviewers, or editors (COPE, 2024; Elsevier, 2025).

Taking into account the aforementioned international standards, the Journal establishes the following criteria for the use of AI in submitted manuscripts and throughout its editorial processes.

For authors

Researchers who use AI tools in the development of their work must explicitly disclose such use in the methodology section, as well as in any other relevant sections of the manuscript. In addition, authors must inform the Journal's editorial team at the time of submission, specifying:

a) The AI tool(s) used.
b) The stage(s) of the research process in which each tool was used.
c) The purpose for which each tool was used.
d) The contribution of the AI tool(s) to the research results.

Responsability

Ethical conduct and intellectual honesty in research resulting in scientific contributions are fundamental values of the Journal. Therefore, researchers are responsible for all information and data obtained through the use of AI tools and are expected to ensure transparency regarding their use.

Limitations on the use of AI

a) Authorship of a manuscript must be exclusively human, as authorship entails judgment and responsibility that AI tools cannot assume. Therefore, manuscripts listing AI as an author or co-author will not be accepted.

b) Any use of AI in the content of a manuscript must be disclosed in writing to the Journal's editorial team. Failure to do so may result in rejection of the submission.

c) AI tools must not be cited as references or included in the bibliography of manuscripts submitted for publication.

d) The use of any AI tool for the creation or modification of images, including graphs, tables, charts, diagrams, photographs, and similar materials, is not permitted. The origin and authenticity of such materials must be preserved and respected, except when AI use serves a pedagogical purpose within the research process and is explicitly disclosed.

Use of AI in the editorial process

To support and strengthen the review and evaluation of manuscripts submitted to the Journal, DYCSVICTORIA uses the iThenticate software developed by Turnitin. This tool generates a similarity report that identifies textual overlap and provides links to potentially copied sources, as well as a separate report indicating the likelihood of AI-generated authorship. Together, these reports contribute to the detection of possible cases of plagiarism.

Editorial responsibility

a) The Journal's editorial team is committed to receiving and validating disclosures regarding the use of AI tools in submitted manuscripts. The absence of such disclosures may justify rejecting a submission in order to ensure that published works contribute meaningfully to the generation of scientific knowledge.

b) At any stage of the editorial process, the editorial team may request clarification from authors regarding the content of a manuscript before accepting it for peer review and eventual publication.

c) The editorial team verifies that all submitted manuscripts comply with these criteria. Failure to do so may result in rejection.

For readers

a) The Journal reviews AI-generated content to ensure that it does not infringe copyright or intellectual property rights.

b) The Journal verifies, based on authors' disclosures, that any AI tools used in the preparation of published contributions comply with applicable licensing policies and authorship declaration requirements.

c) The Journal applies the aforementioned review tool consistently to all manuscripts it publishes and informs authors of the review results in a timely manner, enabling them to address and clarify any potential cases of plagiarism.

 

References

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2024). COPE Council. COPE Position Statement – Authorship and AI. https://doi.org/10.24318/cCVRZBms

Elsevier. (November 12, 2025). Generative AI Policies for Journals. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals